Requirements Engineering, CSU Long Beach, Penzenstadler

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Status''': under construction until May 2017, but you can take a look at the work in progress.''
 
 
 
=== Overview ===
 
=== Overview ===
  
Line 42: Line 40:
 
=== Methods of Assessment ===
 
=== Methods of Assessment ===
  
* Per learning objective, there is a team assignment or an individual assignment that is worked on in lab and then further improved and finalized as homework.
+
The students will undertake a semester-long requirements engineering project, composed of individual, written assignments (to practice and demonstrate the skills from the course objectives above). Students may form teams of no more than three members. All members must participate equally, although not necessarily doing the same jobs.
* In addition, there are two exams, a midterm and a final. The author usually gives the students the respective midterm and final of the previous year as practice exams.
+
Per learning objective, there is a team assignment or an individual assignment that is worked on in lab and then further improved and finalized as homework.
 +
 
 +
Sample assignments:
 +
* Eliciting and documenting the stakeholders for a software system.
 +
* Developing a use case in UML.
 +
* Performing a review of quality requirements.
 +
 
 +
In addition, there are two exams, a midterm and a final. The author usually gives the students the respective midterm and final of the previous year as practice exams.
  
 
=== Course Outline ===
 
=== Course Outline ===
Line 70: Line 75:
 
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="10" ! style="text-align:center; color:purple"
 
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="10" ! style="text-align:center; color:purple"
 
!  Week
 
!  Week
Lecture
+
Lectures
| Lab / Activities
+
| Labs / Activities
 
!  Reading Assignments
 
!  Reading Assignments
  
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
| 1
 
| 1
| Course Introduction and syllabus ([[File:2017 spring 542CourseSyllabus.pdf]])
+
| Course Introduction  
Brief overview of RE - Why do we need Requirements Engineering and what is it?
+
* Syllabus ([[File:2017_spring_542CourseSyllabus.pdf|Syllabus]])
 +
* Brief overview of RE - Why do we need Requirements Engineering and what is it? (slides1)
 +
* Introduction to natural language requirements: EARS - "Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax" (slides2)
 
|
 
|
Brief overview of HFOSS and the planned activities
+
* Brief overview of HFOSS and the planned activities
 +
* Review HFOSS projects for interest:
 +
http://openmrs.org/
 
|
 
|
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
+
* [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html Free software]
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software
+
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software Open source software]
* http://www.foss2serve.org/index.php/HFOSS_Communities  
+
* [http://www.foss2serve.org/index.php/HFOSS_Communities HFOSS communities]
 +
* Review HFOSS projects for interest:
 +
[http://openmrs.org/ OpenMRS]
  
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
| 2
 
| 2
| Topic
+
|  
* Lecture: Principles: Definitions, process, roles, problem/solution view, artifact orientation
+
* Principles: Process and roles (slides3)
 +
* Frameworks, templates, and standards
 
|
 
|
 
* Lab: Find the equivalents of those elements in HFOSS project, e.g. OpenMRS
 
* Lab: Find the equivalents of those elements in HFOSS project, e.g. OpenMRS
Line 99: Line 111:
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
|- style="text-align:left; color:black"
 
| 3
 
| 3
| Topic
+
|  
* Lecture: System Models: Decomposition and abstraction, system views
+
* AMDiRE: Artifact model for domain-indenpendent requirements engineering (slides5)
 +
* Business Case Analysis: Why are we building this system?
 
|
 
|
 
* Activity:  
 
* Activity:  
Line 120: Line 133:
 
| 5
 
| 5
 
| Topic
 
| Topic
* Lecture: Business Case Analysis: Why are we building this system?
+
* Lecture:  
 
|
 
|
 
* Lab: Make a business case (pitch) for a system
 
* Lab: Make a business case (pitch) for a system
Line 225: Line 238:
 
=== Notes to Instructor ===
 
=== Notes to Instructor ===
  
* ''Tips, suggestions, lessons learned (warnings)...''
+
* Lessons learned
 +
** Students like working with real systems as opposed to "toy systems" they come up with
 +
** Re-documenting a software system is kind of boring, so I'd suggest to find a happy medium in between letting students recover requirements and letting them come up with new ones.
 +
** It seems a little tough to get some open source communities interested in reengineering requirements, as they are focused on moving forward with the system and don't necessarily see a need for higher level requirements.
  
Here are a couple of books on requirements engineering as this topic is not covered in depth within this wiki:
+
* Books: Here are a couple of books on requirements engineering as this topic is not covered in depth within this wiki:
* Karl Wiegers and Joy Beatty: “Software Requirements”
+
** Karl Wiegers and Joy Beatty: “Software Requirements”
* Axel van Lamsweerde: “Requirements Engineering”
+
** Axel van Lamsweerde: “Requirements Engineering”
* Klaus Pohl: “Requirements Engineering”
+
** Klaus Pohl: “Requirements Engineering”
  
 
For the HFOSS part of the course, please refer to the internal and external references in the table above.
 
For the HFOSS part of the course, please refer to the internal and external references in the table above.
Line 236: Line 252:
 
=== Moving Forward ===
 
=== Moving Forward ===
  
* This course is held for the first time in Spring 2017. If this page is not updated by August 2017 with experiences and further steps for moving forward, please hassle me per email so I do it :)
+
* This course was held for the first time in Spring 2017.  
 +
* The data collected is still analysis.
  
 
--------------------
 
--------------------

Revision as of 13:05, 19 July 2017

Contents

Overview

Course Requirements Engineering
Institution California State University Long Beach
Instructor(s) Birgit Penzenstadler
Term CECS 542, California State University Long Beach, Birgit Penzenstadler, 4th year undergraduate, or graduate
Course Overview Intermediate/advanced, elective.

This course aims to equip students to develop techniques of software-intensive systems through successful requirements analysis techniques and requirements engineering. Students learn systematic process of developing requirements through cooperative problem analysis, representation, and validation. Lecture 2 hours, Lab 4 hours. Semester long team project plus midterm and final exam. Letter grade only (A-F).

Course Length {{{courselength}}}
Student Characteristics 15-30 students of mixed backgrounds, some transfer, so not necessarily same software engineering knowledge
Prerequisites basic knowledge about the principles of software engineering and the software lifecycle
Infrastructure classroom, lab, slides, online materials


Learning Objectives

This course is the essential stepping-stone for conducting successful large, complex software engineering projects. It introduces students in depth to requirements engineering, which lays the foundation for design and all subsequent development phases. It prepares students for complex projects by introducing them to a variety of techniques that enable to analyze and specify requirements from different application domains and stakeholders. The course provides students with the necessary skillset to communicate, analyze, and negotiate with a wide range of potential stakeholders in a project. After completing the course students will be able to elicit, analyze, document and verify and validate requirements. In particular, they will be able to perform:

  • Stakeholder identification and analysis
  • Goal identification and analysis
  • Creating and refining a system vision
  • Developing a domain model of all involved application domains
  • Developing a usage model (in the form of UML use cases)
  • Eliciting and specifying quality requirements
  • Quality assurance techniques
  • Requirements management

Furthermore, they will be able to navigate a free open source software context with its development processes and best practices.

Methods of Assessment

The students will undertake a semester-long requirements engineering project, composed of individual, written assignments (to practice and demonstrate the skills from the course objectives above). Students may form teams of no more than three members. All members must participate equally, although not necessarily doing the same jobs. Per learning objective, there is a team assignment or an individual assignment that is worked on in lab and then further improved and finalized as homework.

Sample assignments:

  • Eliciting and documenting the stakeholders for a software system.
  • Developing a use case in UML.
  • Performing a review of quality requirements.

In addition, there are two exams, a midterm and a final. The author usually gives the students the respective midterm and final of the previous year as practice exams.

Course Outline

This course exposes students to the problem of determining and specifying what a proposed software system should do, why and for whom the system is needed, not how the system should do it, which is the topic of downstream software engineering activities such as design and coding. There are some nontechnical aspects of the course, with respect to communication and negotiation with multiple stakeholders. Most of the course covers technical approaches to the requirements problem, such as techniques for eliciting stakeholder goals and requirements, notations and models for documenting and specifying requirements, strategies for negotiating requirements, and techniques for analyzing documented requirements. In detail, the course covers the following topics (1 per week, 2 class meetings per week):

  1. Why do we need Requirements Engineering and what is it?
  2. Principles: Definitions, process, roles
  3. System Models: Decomposition and abstraction, system views
  4. Frameworks: What reference structures can I use for requirements?
  5. Business Case Analysis: Why are we building this system?
  6. Stakeholders: Who are the people to talk to about requirements?
  7. Goals and Constraints: What are the major objectives for the system?
  8. System Vision: What exactly do we want to achieve?
  9. Domain Models: What are the surrounding systems ours interacts with?
  10. Usage Models: How will the system interact with the user?
  11. Software quality models: How to determine the quality characteristics?
  12. Quality requirements: How to specify which qualities need to be met?
  13. Quality assurance: How to ensure that RE is done in a good way?
  14. Change management: How to evolve requirements?

The class consists of interactive lectures from faculty and of lab discussion sessions. The assignments that are carried out in teams will be discussed together in class. Students will benefit from structured lectures that cover an adequate number of examples to facilitate student learning and introduce students to the topics covered. The instructor will introduce all requirements engineering methods and techniques in lectures using a number of examples and hands-on collaborative exercises using HFOSS. Also students will be provided with individual and team assignments and projects that are done outside of class or lab.

The following table provides a course overview per week. Each row per week describes the lecture topic and lab topic and activities. Note that this course currently has two meetings per week and CSULB has 15 week semesters, so some topics may have to be shortened in a different course setting.

Week Lectures Labs / Activities Reading Assignments
1 Course Introduction
  • Syllabus (File:2017 spring 542CourseSyllabus.pdf)
  • Brief overview of RE - Why do we need Requirements Engineering and what is it? (slides1)
  • Introduction to natural language requirements: EARS - "Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax" (slides2)
  • Brief overview of HFOSS and the planned activities
  • Review HFOSS projects for interest:

http://openmrs.org/

OpenMRS

2
  • Principles: Process and roles (slides3)
  • Frameworks, templates, and standards
  • Lab: Find the equivalents of those elements in HFOSS project, e.g. OpenMRS
3
  • AMDiRE: Artifact model for domain-indenpendent requirements engineering (slides5)
  • Business Case Analysis: Why are we building this system?
  • Activity:
  • read this
4 Topic
  • Lecture: Frameworks: What reference structures can I use for requirements?
  • Lab: Introduce activity (Re-)Engineering a Software Requirements Specification (to be filled in)
    • Part 1: Research the ISO RE standard 29148 and requirements specification templates.
    • Part 2: Find the requirements documented for OpenMRS and sort the information into a requirements specification template.
  • read this
5 Topic
  • Lecture:
  • Lab: Make a business case (pitch) for a system
  • read this
6 Topic
  • Lecture: Stakeholders: Who are the people to talk to about requirements?
  • read this
7 Topic
  • Lecture: Goals and Constraints: What are the major objectives for the system?
  • read this
8 Topic
  • Lecture: System Vision: What exactly do we want to achieve?
  • Monk & Howard paper on Rich Pictures
  • Online tutorial by TheOpenUniversity
9 Topic
  • Lecture: Domain Models: What are the surrounding systems ours interacts with?
  • Activity
  • read this
10 Topic
  • Lecture: Usage Models: How will the system interact with the user?
  • read this
11 Topic
  • Lecture: Software quality models: How to determine the quality characteristics?
  • read this
12 Topic
  • Lecture: Quality requirements: How to specify which qualities need to be met?
  • read this
13 Topic
  • Lecture: Quality assurance: How to ensure that RE is done in a good way?
  • read this
14 Topic
  • Lecture: Change management: How to evolve requirements?
  • Activity: Bug tracker activity (to be linked)
  • read this
15 Recap Final exam
  • practice exam


Notes to Instructor

  • Lessons learned
    • Students like working with real systems as opposed to "toy systems" they come up with
    • Re-documenting a software system is kind of boring, so I'd suggest to find a happy medium in between letting students recover requirements and letting them come up with new ones.
    • It seems a little tough to get some open source communities interested in reengineering requirements, as they are focused on moving forward with the system and don't necessarily see a need for higher level requirements.
  • Books: Here are a couple of books on requirements engineering as this topic is not covered in depth within this wiki:
    • Karl Wiegers and Joy Beatty: “Software Requirements”
    • Axel van Lamsweerde: “Requirements Engineering”
    • Klaus Pohl: “Requirements Engineering”

For the HFOSS part of the course, please refer to the internal and external references in the table above.

Moving Forward

  • This course was held for the first time in Spring 2017.
  • The data collected is still analysis.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

CC license.png


Materials linked to by this page may be governed by other licenses.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Events
Learning Resources
HFOSS Projects
Evaluation
Navigation
Toolbox